Deny, Deny, Deny review – doping play puts sport in the Faust lane - The Guardian
Jonathan Maitland, as a journalist turned playwright, has a knack of tackling topical issues. After An Audience With Jimmy Savile comes his new play about doping in sport. Though it is set in the near future, it posits a plausible scenario about the use of sophisticated gene editing and suffers only from the characters’ tendency to converse in snappy aphorisms.
It takes the form of a Faustian morality play. Eve is a young sprinter who has come to Shepherd’s Bush from Sierra Leone and whose dream is to win gold in the forthcoming Olympics. Despite the doubts of her journalist boyfriend, Tom, she engages a new coach, Rona, who turns out to be a tracksuited Mephistopheles. Rona not only pits her against a rival runner and gets her to dump Tom but advocates the use of injections that change the composition of Eve’s body cells. We wait to see whether Eve, having been assured that the process is “safe, legal and natural”, will succumb to temptation.
Maitland writes well about the dynamics of the coach-athlete relationship, about the overweening nature of Olympic ambitions and about the fact that there is no such thing as a level playing field. “An unfair advantage is what sport is,” says Eve, citing the physical differences between international competitors. But, although Rona claims “I hate talking in headlines”, she constantly speaks as if there is a subeditor at her elbow: “the testers walk, the athletes run”, “cheating is a national industry” and “losing feels worse than winning feels good” are just a few of the handy phrases that rise unbidden to her lips, demanding to be set in 24-point bold. I’d like to hear more about Rona’s background. I also couldn’t believe that an anti-doping inquiry would be conducted as informally as it is here, with Rona shouting abuse from the sidelines.
No comments: